Roblox Pays $12 Million to Nevada in Child Safety Settlement
Roblox agreed to pay $12 million to Nevada and improve child safety features on its gaming platform. The settlement came after the state prepared to sue Roblox for lacking basic protections against predators and exploitation of young users.
Roblox will pay $12 million to Nevada and implement new child safety measures after the state threatened to sue the popular gaming platform. Nevada Attorney General Aaron Ford said his office approached Roblox in preparation for a lawsuit over claims the platform lacked basic features to protect children from predators and exploitation.
The gaming platform is hugely popular with kids and teens, who use it to play user-created games and chat with other players. Nevada officials were concerned that children could be targeted by adults with bad intentions through the platform's communication features.
Under the settlement, Roblox must add new safety tools and protections for young users. The company said it was proud to work with Nevada officials on what it called a "landmark agreement" that builds on efforts to create new digital safety standards.
"Roblox is proud to have worked alongside Attorney General Ford to reach this landmark agreement, which builds on our work to establish a new standard for digital safety," said Matt Kaufman, Roblox's Chief Safety Officer.
The deal shows how state officials are taking a tougher stance on tech companies when it comes to protecting children online. Other states may follow Nevada's lead in demanding better safety features from gaming and social media platforms.
Millions of children use Roblox to play games and chat with others online. Better safety features could protect kids from strangers who try to harm them through the platform. This deal could push other gaming companies to add similar protections.
Roblox must implement the new child safety features according to the settlement timeline. Other states may pursue similar actions against gaming platforms.
Was this article helpful?
0 people found this helpful